The Buyer’s Compass for Database and Big Data Security is a practical aid for narrowing vendor options during RFI/RFP cycles by aligning product selection with prioritized use cases, functional and non-functional criteria, prerequisites, and structured vendor questions. It is positioned as a starting point rather than a complete vendor-selection methodology, intended to help organizations shortlist candidates and proceed with deeper RFIs and proof-of-concepts while ensuring technical and organizational readiness.
The market context emphasizes that databases remain central to storing business-critical information and face diverse threats, including denial-of-service, human error, excessive privileges, compromised accounts, unpatched vulnerabilities, API-layer attacks (e.g., SQL injection), poor lifecycle handling of backups and test data, weak key management (notably in cloud), and insufficient monitoring and tamper-proof auditing. As digital transformation expands data volume and heterogeneity, the traditional boundary between “database” and “big data” is less meaningful for compliance: regulations treat “data as data,” and required protections depend on business context. Effective security therefore spans the full information protection lifecycle—from creation/discovery and classification through use and ultimately secure disposal or archival—using layered controls across data, infrastructure, and consuming applications.
Because no single capability covers all needs, organizations are encouraged to evaluate solutions as part of a multi-layered enterprise security architecture with centralized governance, management, and analytics, mindful that data moves across environments and technology stacks. The document outlines key use cases (IP protection, cloud migration, discovery/classification, access governance, incident response/breach notification, desensitization/disposal), maps these to functional criteria (e.g., threat prevention, monitoring, encryption, masking, automation), and complements them with vendor-oriented non-functional criteria (deployment models, ecosystem, compliance support, roadmap, maturity). It also highlights prerequisites such as hybrid deployment planning, measurable metrics, extensibility, skills, governance, ownership, training, SLAs, and risk-based policies.
See All Locations
See All Locations