This is an update of our 2024 report on Policy Based Access Management. If you would like to see what this report entails, you can view it by clicking this link.
This Leadership Compass evaluates various solutions, covering a range of use cases and capabilities like Policy-Based Access Management (PBAM) and JIT privileged access, and offers insights into whether solutions provide broad functionality or specialize deeply, guiding readers to choose options that best fit their needs.
Inclusion Criteria
We look at all solutions that support PBAM and at minimum either policy administration and policy governance or policy decision and enforcements. Solutions can be focused on specific use cases.
- Solutions should provide a consistent model for decision point, enforcement points (relying on applications etc.) and distributed policy management points
- Solutions should perform authorization decisions at runtime for various and distributed systems
- Solutions should provide policy lifecycle management for creating, testing, managing, implementing, updating, and retiring policies.
- Solutions should support externalized and internalized authorization services.
- Solutions should adhere to standards such as XACML, OPA, Rego, OpenFGA for defining policies in a consistent manner and integration with applications and systems
Exclusion Criteria
We exclude solutions that don’t support PBAM approaches which are not basing decisions on defined and centrally managed policies.
- Solutions that support policy-based authorization decisions only for proprietary instances
- Solutions that are limited to RBAC support
- Solutions that have limited deployments e.g. start-ups, proof-of-concept only
- Solutions that do not have active customers yet
However, there are no further exclusion criteria such as revenue or number of customers. We cover vendors from all regions, from start-ups to large companies.